Well he seems rather ignorant of the English language, calling the skull an "artefact", which it may well be, and having a section on his site on "Providence" when he should have said "provenance".
A scientist would have had these pointed out and corrected at the dirst peer review. But I fear Mr Pye is a mere autodidact who would like to waste our time.
Well he seems rather ignorant of the English language, calling the skull an "artefact", which it may well be, and having a section on his site on "Providence" when he should have said "provenance".
ReplyDeleteA scientist would have had these pointed out and corrected at the dirst peer review. But I fear Mr Pye is a mere autodidact who would like to waste our time.
well, your dirst peer review fairs no better i fear.....
ReplyDelete....and as an autodidact myself i see his point.