so, not only isn`t there free speech in this country, there isn`t free speech on the blogs either.
when one wants to point out the glaring fraud being commited by the standing president regarding how to spend taxpayer`s money one is called a racist.
now, my definition of a racist is someone who, by thier actions, infringes on the ability of another to life in peace....and we all know what that means in the many different ways that racism occurs.
like having your own t.v. network.
like having your own schools.
like having programs, movements, laws and assets set aside for yourselves.
things like that.
and as vincent said in a comment previously, this has little to do with the chocolate messiah.
this has to do with liberal apologetics. an intellectual process whereby those who have make amends to those who have not.....and substantially make sure they are kept down.
apologetics has two effects. it makes those who have some feel guilty for the things they have, and secondly it makes those who have not look toward those who have as somehow depriving them of something.
out of this atmosphere of apologetics comes civil liberties, affirmative action, race laws, burgeoning social programs ostensibly helping those incapable of helping themselves...and a general mood of divisiveness.
is the black population of america incapable of being industrious?
according to some intellectuals this is so.
and some prominent black leaders keep telling thier congregations this also.
so who`s racist?