I think it is a trick question, for it suggests that consciousness and intellect are the same thing.
We only know of our own consciousness by introspection - even if we can correlate it with measurement brain-waves.
Your consciousness and mine is always connected with sensual awareness - of our own body as well as the outside world - together with other less easily-defined inputs from unconscious or barely-conscious brain functioning, e.g. those parts which control body functions (auto-immune system, hormone regulation, autonomic nervous system etc): together with emotions.
In short, I who am conscious am much more than a computer. Why should I suppose that abstracting my logical abilities into a machine and speeding them up should spontaneously generate consciousness?
The question is exactly the same as one which may have puzzled medieval thinkers when they observed cunningly-designed automatons striking the chimes on elaborate public clocks; or the question posed in the fairy-tale about Pinocchio; or if we go back far enough, the myth of Pygmalion.
i have this discussion often. i find that there are always those who are uncomfortable with the idea of silicon consciousness. it doesn`t matter much whether the thoughts are "real" or an emulation or analog. if a computer becomes powerful enough to emulate thought, ethics, morals, and survival imperatives you`d better not be still sitting around debating whether it`s truly conscious or not. it is the nature of groups of humans to become less "conscious" as they administrate........that`s why governments and corporations have the potential to be destructive to the needs of the individual. does the large organisation become a seperate entity? the legal description tends to say yes.
I see what you mean. A large organisation (or even a committee, in fact) has its own "consciousness". Yes, it is the monster that Mary Shelley wrote about. The responsibility is always man's.
in my work there are many occasions where i have to re-humanise a corporate entity. the energy released comes, generally, in the form of tears. we are heading for a society run by experts though. the bureaucrats want total control. even those who swear that thier intentions are benign........such as technocracy.ca and thier compatriots in the u.s.
My name is Alistair Kinnear. I am a Certified Hypnotherapist, NLP Practitioner and Life Coach, and I am working on my Doctorate in Divinity. I work in helping people to change behaviour and I like to think that I am waking up their spirit in the process.
4 comments:
I think it is a trick question, for it suggests that consciousness and intellect are the same thing.
We only know of our own consciousness by introspection - even if we can correlate it with measurement brain-waves.
Your consciousness and mine is always connected with sensual awareness - of our own body as well as the outside world - together with other less easily-defined inputs from unconscious or barely-conscious brain functioning, e.g. those parts which control body functions (auto-immune system, hormone regulation, autonomic nervous system etc): together with emotions.
In short, I who am conscious am much more than a computer. Why should I suppose that abstracting my logical abilities into a machine and speeding them up should spontaneously generate consciousness?
The question is exactly the same as one which may have puzzled medieval thinkers when they observed cunningly-designed automatons striking the chimes on elaborate public clocks; or the question posed in the fairy-tale about Pinocchio; or if we go back far enough, the myth of Pygmalion.
i have this discussion often. i find that there are always those who are uncomfortable with the idea of silicon consciousness. it doesn`t matter much whether the thoughts are "real" or an emulation or analog. if a computer becomes powerful enough to emulate thought, ethics, morals, and survival imperatives you`d better not be still sitting around debating whether it`s truly conscious or not.
it is the nature of groups of humans to become less "conscious" as they administrate........that`s why governments and corporations have the potential to be destructive to the needs of the individual.
does the large organisation become a seperate entity?
the legal description tends to say yes.
I see what you mean. A large organisation (or even a committee, in fact) has its own "consciousness". Yes, it is the monster that Mary Shelley wrote about. The responsibility is always man's.
in my work there are many occasions where i have to re-humanise a corporate entity. the energy released comes, generally, in the form of tears.
we are heading for a society run by experts though. the bureaucrats want total control. even those who swear that thier intentions are benign........such as technocracy.ca and thier compatriots in the u.s.
Post a Comment