Thursday, February 22, 2007

couldn`t be........

http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20070222/sc_nm/chimps_hunting_dc

i love the apologies the scientist make for the hunting behaviour.......

we need meat to feed our brains.

the word vegitarian means shitty hunter.

"hmm, this doesn`t fit the existing data.....it must be wrong"

10 comments:

dr.alistair said...

and the two percent difference in our dna includes one less chromasome pair than primates. we have 23 pairs, they have 24.

any physical change in chromasome structure causes mutations. the mutations we see in humans are well within the record of human anthropology.

none of the mutations are adaptive.

none.

not one.

ever.

so in spite of this simple and evident fact we are expected to believe that chimps evolved into humans?

how? by losing a pair of chromasome pairs without suffering the damaging mutations seen in animals due to environmental pressures like radiation or poison or genetic damage in the parents.

the only place that chromasome manipulation could occur safely is in a lab.

maybe that`s what darwin was trying to avoid.

as science emerged it became clear, even a hundred years ago, that human dna had been altered artificially.

we were made in a god`s image, after all.

Hammer said...

I've seen nature films of chimps forming hunting parties and chase down smaller primates and eat them alive.

Whe there is a need for protein they go and get it.

Personally, I'm a vegetarian but don't begrudge carnivores and omnivores, everyone should take what they need to survive and thrive.

dr.alistair said...

i just think that the vegitarian issue has become so political that many people make thier food choices purely for that reason.

and wonder why they`re enemic as a result.

one arguement against meat as a food is that it takes more calories to digest the food than provided in the meat.

there must be some other reason for the necessity for meat onour diets then.

another is that it must be taken from an unwilling host.

(sigh.)

BBC said...

Of course chimps evolved into human beings. Or human beans. Never mind the statements about DNA, still a lot to learn about that.

And it looks like maybe a whole new order of them may be on the way up the order of things. Maybe to replace us after we fuck this world all up. I wish them luck.

What makes them like us? Thumbs, they also have thumbs. That is what allows us to do wonderful things. And stupid and destructive things.

Well, the less evolved ones of us anyway. Like the Christians and Muslims. Opp's, did I say that out loud?

As for eating meat. Just tear off it's horns, wipe its ass and herd it in here.

God is a meat eater, get over it.

dr.alistair said...

raccoons have thumbs too.

they be rodents.

varmints.

we may share dna.....but we didn`t evolve over time through natural selection as darwin suggested.

that needs a lab.

a god could do that.

a god could also build a new human too.

and that might be underway as we speak.

maybe we are those gods.

BBC said...

Oh for christs sake. Darwin was right on track, for his time, the work just wasn't complete is all.

Of course God can build a new human. Through doctors and scientists. And a much better human I dare say.

Of course we are those Gods. Now go burn a fucking bible.

Opps, did I say that out loud?

I'm going to bed early, God needs sleep when in a piece of shit human body.

Try to be good until I get back. Well, at least try to not go insane.

Find a hooker, it will make you feel better. Never met a hooker I didn't like. No games there, other than agreeing on the price.

But it's never the cost of a house.

dr.alistair said...

ok bill, you haven`t actually read any of darwin`s words have you?

he states clearly in many of his works, including his notes while on the galapagos islands, that he saw changes in species that had adapted to environmental stresses.

he suggested that this adapting process could explain the diversity of species, but never actually said the one species could change to another.

this was the inference of the royal society when he returned to england.

had that inference not been made then the emerging science of the day would have begun to ask the question in more accurate ways.

which question?

what the fuck is this weak, hairless biped with the oversized brain doing here?

it has taken us many leaps in technology to be anywhere near to being as comfortable as the rabbit in a hole or a bird in it`s nest.

we die very quickly without our manufactured products.

BBC said...

A human body dies, that is all.

The spirit is omnipresent.

They sure teach it a lot of stupid things when it arrives here though.

Depending on what part of the world you are born in.

No, I haven't fully read Darwin, and won't, read enough to understand somewhat of what he was saying.

But even Darwin believed in a spirit even though he didn't understand what it was.

BBC said...

A human body dies, that is all.

The spirit is omnipresent.

They sure teach it a lot of stupid things when it arrives here though.

Depending on what part of the world you are born in.

No, I haven't fully read Darwin, and won't, read enough to understand somewhat of what he was saying.

But even Darwin believed in a spirit even though he didn't understand what it was.

dr.alistair said...

i had an idea that was what you meant bill.

thanks for your honesty.

too many people believe a grade school teacher about things like darwin, when in fact if they just read a small amount of the actual work in question they would realise there are some unanswered questions.

a spiritual eoulution is underway and i see some small evidence of it occasionally.

i don`t think it matters so much if it is physically too late though.

the physical is an illusion.

i personally think that darwin got played by a group of scientific pioneers who wanted dominion over society.

we are dangerously close to that now.